An Alternative to Improve the Interconnection Arrangement of Mobile Communications Market: A Comparison between Bill & Keep vs. Calling Party’s Network Pay Method 


Vol. 36,  No. 3, pp. 231-239, Mar.  2011


PDF
  Abstract

This paper reviews the recent theoretical and empirical studies on the European countries that the bill and keep settlement between mobile operators is superior to the financial settlement like CPNP from the perspectives of social welfare and fare competition in market. Besides these the recent studies, considering the change of mobile wholesale market in Korea, the necessity to introduce the bill and keep settlement as an alternative for the current CPNP as well as policy implication is examined.

  Statistics
Cumulative Counts from November, 2022
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view. If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


  Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

M. Kim, "An Alternative to Improve the Interconnection Arrangement of Mobile Communications Market: A Comparison between Bill & Keep vs. Calling Party’s Network Pay Method," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 231-239, 2011. DOI: .

[ACM Style]

Moon-Soo Kim. 2011. An Alternative to Improve the Interconnection Arrangement of Mobile Communications Market: A Comparison between Bill & Keep vs. Calling Party’s Network Pay Method. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 36, 3, (2011), 231-239. DOI: .

[KICS Style]

Moon-Soo Kim, "An Alternative to Improve the Interconnection Arrangement of Mobile Communications Market: A Comparison between Bill & Keep vs. Calling Party’s Network Pay Method," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 231-239, 3. 2011.

Search
(IN TITLE, AUTHOR, ABSTRACT,KEYWORDS)

Advanced Search ▼

POPULAR KEYWORDS
(TOP 10 KEYWORDS)

Recent Publications
(LAST 3 YEARS)






pISSN : 1226 - 4717
eISSN : 2287 - 3880