Performance Comparison in Estimating the Number of Competing Terminals in IEEE 802.11 Networks (Kalman vs. H Infinity Filter) 


Vol. 37,  No. 11, pp. 1001-1011, Nov.  2012


PDF
  Abstract

In this paper, the effects to system performance are evaluated in IEEE 802.11 system when the number of competing terminals are estimated and reflected to the system. The IEEE 802.11 system uses DCF (Distributed Coordination Function) for the multiple access method, and the system throughput performance depends on the accuracy of the estimated number of competing terminals. We propose extended H infinity filter (EHIF) approach which does not require the noise information for estimating the number of competing terminals. Simulation results show that EHIF outperforms the extended Kalman filter in both saturated and non-saturated network conditions.

  Statistics
Cumulative Counts from November, 2022
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view. If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


  Cite this article

[IEEE Style]

T. Kim, J. Lim, D. Hong, "Performance Comparison in Estimating the Number of Competing Terminals in IEEE 802.11 Networks (Kalman vs. H Infinity Filter)," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1001-1011, 2012. DOI: .

[ACM Style]

Taejin Kim, Jaechan Lim, and Daehyoung Hong. 2012. Performance Comparison in Estimating the Number of Competing Terminals in IEEE 802.11 Networks (Kalman vs. H Infinity Filter). The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 37, 11, (2012), 1001-1011. DOI: .

[KICS Style]

Taejin Kim, Jaechan Lim, Daehyoung Hong, "Performance Comparison in Estimating the Number of Competing Terminals in IEEE 802.11 Networks (Kalman vs. H Infinity Filter)," The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1001-1011, 11. 2012.